for the love of cricket and the hatred of america

NY Times, March 23rd. Shashi Tharoor's op-ed about the lack of interest in cricket amongst Americans is mean-spirited and uncalled for. I appreciate the fact that it must be frustrating to try to get Americans interested in cricket, but does one have to be so ill-tempered about it? It seems he simply wanted to vent his spleen about America (you obviously have other issues with the U.S., Dr. Tharoor) and somehow sees American indifference to cricket as a symbol of all that is small-minded, homogenized, and impatient about our country. "You may as well learn to accept that there are some things too special for the rest of us to want to waste them on you." I have no desire to play that sort of ad hominem game with you, Dr. Tharoor. I find cricket fascinating and have enjoyed learning about it as well as playing it, but the sports marketplace is rather crowded in this country. Barriers to entry are quite high, especially with the (not always massive) popularity of cricket's little brother baseball. Cricket's lack of popularity is not due to some inherent flaw in the American character, but rather its late-comer status and relative similarity to a previously existing game.

If I have been misreading this, and in fact it is an example of extremely dry sarcasm, I will be happy to be corrected. But the tone did not feel that way to me. The fact that a man of such bile and bitterness very nearly became UN Secretary-General must give one pause.