Thursday, April 19, 2007

virginia tech and gun control

Amidst all of the commentary surrounding this tragic event, it seems that there is one practical thing that can be done to help reduce the risk of such things happening in the future. It is not radically changing our gun control laws, which the states rightly have considerable power over. It is simply to include checks for mental illness in the background check process. Mr. Cho did not have a criminal record, but he did have a record of mental illness that was accessible after the fact. So let's just include those sorts of records in background checks. I think that people on all sides of the gun control debate can agree on that, aside from those who believe that all background checks are unwarranted and/or against the spirit of the Second Amendment. Obviously there is the risk that people who are simply suspected or accused of having some sort of mental illness will be denied the right to own guns. However, I do not think that denying the mentally ill or those suspected of mental illness the right to own guns will severely damage the Second Amendment. I believe in the right of the people to bear arms; reasonable restrictions are by and large accepted by the vast majority of gun owners.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The problem in this case is that his mental evaluation looks pretty innocuous (for an ITA, even!)
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/pdf/cho_mentalhealth.pdf?hpid=topnews
Even if this information were available to the people selling him the gun, it doesn't say anything about homicidality or even suicidality.

People will still slip through the cracks. If he was pre-morbid psychotic (e.g. hadn't had a break yet) there's nothing anyone could have done.

Jorge Rodriguez said...

Excellent point, anonymous stranger.

Jamie said...

Haha, here I am finally showing my face...Write more, Jorge!